Legal Opinion
Forlini v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 1, 1926No. 351PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was charged in two indictments, the first, one of 11 counts, with violations of section 160 of the United States Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10330), and the second, with 15 counts, violations of sections 148 and 151 of the United States Criminal Code (Comp. St. §§ 10318,10321). At the trial, they were consolidated) and the plaintiff in error was convicted on all counts. He has sued out this writ, seeking to review this judgment of conviction.
Counts 1 to 11 of the consolidated indictment charge the plaintiff in error, with “intent to utter, pass, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- United States v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Kenneth P. Pitt, Jr., Paul E. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- City of Roswell v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.