Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth P. Pitt, Jr., Paul E. Kane

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 21, 1983No. 82-5078PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

This ease arises from a misbegotten effort to palm off forged foreign corporate stock certificates as security for a five million dollar loan, sought of a broker in Munich, Germany. When the bogus securities were tendered the forgery was immediately detected and the attempted fraud blew up. Kane and Pitt were indicted for (1) wire fraud, committed in the course of efforts to arrange for the negotiation of the forged instruments, and (2) for the possession and delivery of false, forged, or counterfeit stock certificates of a foreign corporation with intent to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald DriscollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coley QUINN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Murray v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  5. United States v. NederCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API