Legal Opinion

Ex parte McGee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin O. George, Judge. Chas. McGee having been refused his liberty on a habeas corpus proceeding, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The petitioner, Charles McGee, was tried and convicted in the municipal court of the city of Portland on a charge *166of violating section 6 of ordinance No. 3983, entitled “An ordinance concerning offenses and disorderly conduct. ” A fine was imposed of $200, and in default of payment he was committed to the city prison for 100 days. A writ of habeas corpus was thereupon sued out in the circuit court for Multnomah county, resulting in a judgment dismissing the writ, from which he appeals to this court.

The primary question presented for consideration is one of power in the municipal court to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith, Administrator v. the Union Bank of GeorgetownSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Hine v. BeldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  3. Hogan v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Ex parte KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Rich v. HussonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harlow v. ClowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Portland v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lane County v. BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Portland v. TraynorOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fish v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API