Legal Opinion

Lane County v. Bristow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Plaintiff Lane County brought two suits to quiet title to lands acquired by it through tax foreclosure proceedings. Darwin Bristow was a defendant in each of the said suits and the only defendant who appeared therein. The issues in each case being the same except that they pertain to different properties, the cases were consolidated for trial and resulted in decrees for the plaintiff from which Bristow, hereinafter called the defendant, has appealed.

The controversy arises out of a general foreclosure suit commenced by Lane County on August 30, 1938, pursuant to the provisions of Ch. 470,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Erwin v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1889
  3. Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Evergreen Timber Co. v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Otto & Harkson Realty Co. v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Harriman v. Linn CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API