Legal Opinion

McLean v. Mayo

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PURNELL, District Judge.

A. D. McLean, trustee of Hoyt & Mitchell, bankrupts, asked for an injunction to restrain the prosecution of a suit by Mayo against Dockery for trespass in seizing the stock of goods under a warrant of the bankruptcy court, alleging that it obstructs and prevents a settlement of the bankrupt estate. Mayo files a duly-verified answer to the rule to show cause, disclaiming any interest in the goods in the hands of the trustee, and surrendering any claim therein he may have, and alleging his election to rely on his remedy in the slate court against Dockery individually,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Wall v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Leroux v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  2. In re Columbia Iron WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1904
  3. In re SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  4. Berman v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1909
  5. In re BaberDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API