Legal Opinion

In re Smith

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

This is a motion for leave to sue a trustee. The petitioner proposes to bring an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property of the bankrupt, and desires to join the trustee as the owner of the equity of redemption.

In my opinion, no leave is necessary to sue a trustee in bankruptcy. The general rule is, of course, that, in the absence of statutory permission, officers of a court, like a receiver, cannot be sued without obtaining leave from the court that appointed them. This rule, however, has been changed by statute as to receivers appointed by United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re EmslieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  2. McLean v. MayoDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vass v. Conron Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. In re Kalb & Berger Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  3. Smith v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Rice v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Stephens v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API