Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of Princeton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 23, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Clay—

Affirming.

At its 1928 session, the General Assembly 'passed “An Act to amend and re-enact an act appearing in chapter ninety-eight, page two hundred and sixty-six of the Acts of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-four, approved on March tenth, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-four, entitled, ‘An Act to provide for the construction of sewers in cities of the fourth class, and to provide for the payment of the same, and repealing subsection nine of section three thousand four- hundred and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Goszler v. Corporation of GeorgetownSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Vogt v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Shaw v. City of MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Katterjohn v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nourse v. City of RussellvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Adams v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Sanitation Dist. No. 1 of Jefferson County v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  4. Krumpelman v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  5. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. St. Matthews Sanitary Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API