Legal Opinion

Shaw v. City of Mayfield

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 30, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*619Opinion op the' Court by

Commissioner Hobson—

Affirming.

Appellant, who is a citizen and taxpayer of the city of Mayfield, brought this action to enjoin the city from proceeding further under an ordinance adopted by the board of council, providing for the construction of a system of sewers in the city of Mayfield and from further proceeding to consummate a contract that had been let for the construction of the work. The circuit court dismissed the petition. The plaintiff appeals.

The proceedings in question were under an ordinance of the city pursuant to the act approved March 10, 1924, Session…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Gosnell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Ray v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Vogt v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Katterjohn v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cty. Govern.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Baker v. City of PrincetonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Hoerth v. City of SturgisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Board Councilmen City of Frankfort v. JillsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Carey-Reed Co. v. SiscoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API