Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Fenix Underground, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 17, 2007No. 59606-3-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — When parties to a tort suit settle their dispute in a written agreement providing for a specified rate of interest, and the court enters judgment to enforce their settlement agreement, then for purposes of RCW 4.56.110 the judgment is founded on a written contract rather than on tortious conduct. It bears interest at the rate specified in the agreement.
Becker, J.
*143¶2 A fight took place outside a nightclub in Seattle’s Pioneer Square at 3:30 in the morning on April 2, 2005. A security guard for Fénix Underground pushed appellant Anthony Jackson to the ground. As a result of the fall,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Chaussee v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Wright v. JeckleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Unigard Insurance v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Unigard Ins. Co. v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Little v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Little v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.