Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1944No. 4 Div. 318PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

On a former appeal in this cause, we held that the defendant was not due the general charge on the issues raised by its pleas in abatement to the complaint, and reversed and remanded the case in order that the jury might pass on the questions of fact thus presented. Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son, 244 Ala. 364, 13 So.2d 396.

After the remand, the trial, from which this appeal was taken, resulted in a verdict for the defendant on its pleas in abatement.

The cause was submitted here on the merits, and on appellee’s (defendant in the court below) motion to strike from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Lovejoy v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. City of Birmingham v. Merchants Cigar & Candy Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bagby Elevator and Electric Company, Inc. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Chaney v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API