Legal Opinion

Chaney v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1944No. 6 Div. 121PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The important and controlling questions (two in number), involved in this case, and properly presented, are dealt with according to the views of the writer, as follows :

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction against appellant in the circuit court of Jefferson County on complaint filed in said circuit court by the City of Birmingham in a case pending in said circuit court on appeal from the Recorder’s Court, wherein said City was the plaintiff and appellant, Jim Chaney, was defendant.

It is shown by the record proper that the judgment appealed from was pronounced…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. McKinstry v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Thompson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. McLosky v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vizzina v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Chaney v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Harris v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Jackson v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Love v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API