Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Baggage & Omnibus Transfer Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Multnomah: Calvin IT. Gantenbein, Judge. Department 1. Clara Hamilton, the plaintiff, traveled by railroad from Sheridan, Wyoming, to Portland, Oregon. Her husband was in the United States Army. Whenever he was transferred from one post to another, she moved with him. Because of one of such transfers from the east to the west she came to Portland.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Calvin IT. Gantenbein, Judge. Department 1. Clara Hamilton, the plaintiff, traveled by railroad from Sheridan, Wyoming, to Portland, Oregon. Her husband was in the United States Army. Whenever he was transferred from one post to another, she moved with him. Because of one of such transfers from the east to the west she came to Portland. Upon her arrival in Portland she delivered to M. E. Norcross a railroad baggage check for a trank which she had checked from Sheridan to Portland. She directed Norcross to deliver the check to some storage company, and to have the storage…

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The defendant claims that the evidence shows that the trunk was stolen. The defendant admits that it received and'stored the trunk in its warehouse. There is nothing to indicate that the trunk was stolen, except the fact that when the plaintiff called for the trunk the defendant searched for it, but could not find it, and the further circumstance that the company kept a watchman in the warehouse.

The defendant contends that because of language employed in the amended complaint the action must be held to be an action in trover, and that therefore the plaintiff cannot prevail if the trunk was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Hannibal Railroad v. SwiftSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Hasbrouck v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Healy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. School Dist. No. 106 v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Real Good Food Store, Inc. v. FIRST NAT. BK. OF Or.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Pierce v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API