Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
There was evidence introduced tending to support the contention of plaintiff to the effect that the contract between her as made for her by her son and the defendant is not embodied in the receipt. The evidence of Mr. States to that effect is positive and is corroborated to a large degree by the letter of defendant to Mr. States, reading as follows:
“Referring to your call at this office on October 15th and arrangement made for delivery of ticket and berth to Mrs. Mahala Pierce at Elmira, New York:
“I am advised that delivery of ticket and berth has been made to Mrs. Pierce and that she left…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Neiman-Marcus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mears v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- McCargar v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Whitlock v. United States Inter-Insurance Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Investment Service Co. v. O'BRIEN AND WEST COAST TERMINALS, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.