Legal Opinion

Charlotte Office Tower Associates v. Carolina SNS Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1988No. 8726DC991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to apply G.S. 42-33 to stay the order of possession. Defendants contend that application of the statute was appropriate and would have allowed defendants to maintain possession of the leased premises. We disagree and affirm.

Defendants argue that Couch v. Realty Corp., 48 N.C. App. 108, 268 S.E. 2d 237 (1980), too restrictively limits application of G.S. 42-33. Defendants contend that G.S. 42-33 should apply to stay dispossession of the tenant except where the lessor has the right under the lease to terminate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoover v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ryan v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Couch v. ADC Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Tucker v. . ArrowoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. EBENEZER, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Stines v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API