Ryan v. . Reynolds
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
From an examination of the lease in controversy, made by plaintiff, there is no clause giving him a right of reentry for the nonpayment of rent. The lease is for 5 years with renewal privilege or right for 5 additional years, rent $25.00, payable semiannually in advance. Simmons v. Jarman, 122 N. C., p. 195.
It is laid down in House v. Parker, 181 N. C., 42, and accepted law in this jurisdiction: “It is true the contract contains no express power of sale; but the general laws of the State in force at the time of its execution and performance enter into and become as much a part of the contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graves v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- O'Kelly v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Midimis v. . MurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Highway Commission v. . VarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Dunn v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- In Re the Guardianship of ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Steele v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Hood Ex Rel. Bank of Summerfield v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.