Legal Opinion

Tucker v. . Arrowood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee OintiAM.

This was an action in summary ejectment, instituted under C. S., 2365, et seq., for nonpayment of rent under a lease containing the following stipulation: “ ... It is understood and agreed that if said lessee shall fail to pay said sum when due or fail to comply with any other provision of this lease, then and in that event, at the option of the lessor, this lease shall be null and void, and the said lessee hereby contracts and agrees to vacate the above described lot or parcel of land on demand of the lessor or his agent, and the said lessee hereby waives all notice to vacate…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office Enterprises, Inc. v. PappasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Couch v. ADC Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Charlotte Office Tower Associates v. Carolina SNS Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API