Legal Opinion

Hughes v. South Bay School District No. 11

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1903No. 4574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County. — Hon. Oliver V. Limsr, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

On April 29, 18Y9, one Hathan Patter- . son, who was then the owner in fee simple of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 32, township 19 north, range 1 west, W. ]VL, executed and delivered to the defendant, the South Bay School District Ho. 11, a certain lease containing the following description, towit:

“I do hereby grant and lease one-half acre of land of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 32, 19 H., of range 1 West, to the South Bay School District Ho. 11 of Thurston County, W. T., for so long as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Humphries v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bradley v. FacklerWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brodsky v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gladstone Mountain Mining Co. v. TweedellWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API