Legal Opinion

Gladstone Mountain Mining Co. v. Tweedell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1925No. 18816. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action to quiet title to mining claims specified in a certain contract, on the ground that the language of the contract, hereinafter italicized to designate the portions involved in this controversy, constitute a cloud upon respondent’s title to the mining claims; and on the ground that any rights of the defendants in the suit, including appellant, based thereon, are unfounded in law and right, and are void, as unjustly and unlawfully interfering with the rights of respondent to own, operate, control and manage the claims involved. The claims were acquired by respondent under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potter v. CouchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Latimer v. . WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kentland Coal & Coke Co. v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. RosenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Williams v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Callwood v. KeanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API