Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1910No. 8524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered September 14, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to quiet title, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action the appellant, claiming to be the owner of a tract of land described as the north half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section twenty-two, in township twenty-two, north, of range five, east of the Willamette Meridian in King county, Washington, sought to have cancelled as a cloud upon his title a tax *672deed thereof issued by the county treasurer. In his complaint the appellant alleged his ownership of the property, that the respondents held a tax deed thereto, that he had tendered to them the full amount of the taxes levied by the taxing officers and paid by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Deford v. MercerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Brown v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Commercial National Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Shelton Logging Co. v. GosserWashington Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. v. Kingston Bank & Thust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bynum v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  4. Ewers v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Ewers v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API