Legal Opinion
United States v. Escamilla-Rojas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2011No. 10-10185PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the taking of guilty pleas at a large group plea hearing violated a criminal defendant’s rights protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Proce dure 11 and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.
I
A
On December 2, 2009, Ameyalli Escamilla-Rojas (“Escamilla”) was arrested and charged with illegal entry into the United States, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1325. A citizen of Mexico, Escamilla was apprehended near Sasabe, Arizona, and was charged with having entered the United States at a time and place other than that designated by immigration officials. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Derrick Loftis v. AlmagerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jamal ShehadehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gilberto Aguilar-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Delcia Arqueta-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. KazzazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.