Legal Opinion

United States v. Kazzaz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 26, 2014No. 12-50532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Ahmed Sarchil Kazzaz pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with one count of conspiracy to defraud and to commit offenses against the United States, six counts of paying kickbacks to a government contractor’s employees to obtain subcontracts and renewals, one count of wire fraud, and four counts of mail fraud. In this appeal, Kazzaz asserts that the District Court erred in finding that his plea satisfied the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(3) requirement for a factual basis.

The government urges that Kazzaz’s appellate waiver forecloses the arguments he makes on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. BiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Jesus Felix-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. SidorenkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API