Legal Opinion

United States v. Delcia Arqueta-Ramos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2013No. 10-10618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Delcia Arqueta-Ramos appeals her conviction for illegally entering the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1825(a)(1). She pled guilty to this offense during an “Operation Streamline” proceeding, which is “ ‘a procedure for the taking of pleas en masse.’ ” United States v. Escamillar-Rojas, 640 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2011), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 101, 184 L.Ed.2d 47 (2012) (quoting United States v. Roblero-Solis, 588 F.3d 692, 693 (9th Cir.2009)).

On appeal, Arqueta-Ramos argues that the plea proceeding violated Federal Rule of Criminal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. Jacobo GraibeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Mark Roy AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
  2. United States v. Ivhan Herrera-ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Thomas Cornelius, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API