Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alaska International Construction, Inc. v. Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1985No. S-440, S-457Published

1Dissent

COMPTON, Justice, with whom

BURKE, Justice, joins, dissenting.

I dissent for the following reasons. First, I believe an “abuse of discretion” standard of review is inapplicable to this case. The proper standard is “substitution of judgment.” Second, even if “abuse of discretion” is applicable, I believe the agency abused its discretion.

I. SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGMENT

Kelly v. Zamarello, 486 P.2d 906 (Alaska 1971), describes two different standards of review applicable for administrative decisions. One involves “complex subject matter or fundamental policy formulations.” The court held that this type…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API