U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed this suit against e-Smart Technologies, Inc., three other companies, and five individuals, asserting numerous violations of the securities laws. One of those individuals, Defendant Robert J. Rowen, has now filed a Motion to Dismiss, contending that this Court has no jurisdiction over him, that venue is improper here, and that the SEC’s Complaint is legally insufficient. Finding Rowen not to prevail on any of his arguments, the Court will deny the Motion.
I. Background
The SEC…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. China Infrastructure Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bombardier, Inc. v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Binance Holdings LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024