Legal Opinion

Frick Co. v. Lindsay

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1928No. 2686PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This suit was instituted in the court below to restrain defendants from alleged infringement of reissue patent No. 15,895, covering an air-agitating tube for refrigerating systems, and for ah accounting of profits derived from the infringement. The court held that the patent was not infringed, and entered a decree dismissing the bill. Complainant is the Prick Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania, engaged in the manufacture of ice making machinery, and the owner by mesne assignments of the patent in suit, which was originally issued to defendant Robert P. Lindsay and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  4. Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Shamrock Technologies, Inc. v. Medical Sterilization, Inc., and Robert S. LuniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API