State v. Sutton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Defendant’s attorney violated Rule 28(b)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure which requires that exceptions and assignments of error be set out after each question argued in appellant’s brief. Although we elect to reach the merits of defendant’s case as authorized under Rule 2, we note that defendant, by not referring us to the point in the record where the alleged error occurred, has placed upon this Court the responsibility of searching the record for the exceptions and assignments of error upon which he bases his argument. Defendant will not be heard to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. WilletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019