Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 2014No. COA13-757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the State presents substantial evidence of each element of the charge of embezzlement, defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge is properly denied. Where evidence of prior bad acts admitted pursuant to Rule 404(b) is used to show, inter alia, motive, intent and common plan or scheme, and where the probative value of such evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect, the trial court has neither erred nor abused its discretion by admitting the evidence.

In 2008, defendant Susan Lynette Parker began work as a secretary in the Union County Public Schools (the “school system”).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. BRRRT Properties, LLC v. PfeiferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. Porters Neck Limited, LLC v. Porters Neck Country Club, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. RosalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API