Legal Opinion

Kastenmeier v. Keske

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The order which is before us is not an appealable one, and therefore this appeal must be dismissed. Even though this issue was not raised by the parties, it is our responsibility to examine the question of appealability on our own motion. Dombrowski v. Tomasino (1964), 24 Wis. (2d) 16, 127 N. W. (2d) 786; Lentz v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 569, 120 N. W. (2d) 722; Yaeger v. Fenske (1962), 15 Wis. (2d) 572, 113 N. W. (2d) 411.

The order appealed from in this case provides for the appointment of a special administrator and fixes the bond, apparently pursuant to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yaeger v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Willing v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kingston v. KingstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Greatens v. LiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Dombrowski v. TomasinoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BagnallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Abbott v. Sellon (In Re Estate)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re Estate of Abbott-OchsnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. McCarville v. HinkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API