Legal Opinion

Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children v. Pierce

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Respondent takes the position that the order which the residuary legatee seeks to have reviewed by this court is nonappealable. If that contention is correct, the appeal must be dismissed and this court is foreclosed from inquiry into the merits.

“The appealability of an order, or judgment, is a matter going to the subject matter jurisdiction of the supreme court. The court has no subject matter jurisdiction if the matter is not appealable .... If the matter is not ap-pealable, it is the duty of the court to dismiss the appeal on its own motion, even though the parties may not have raised the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willing v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kingston v. KingstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Kastenmeier v. KeskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Peebles v. Milwaukee County Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. A. J. Straus Paying Agency, Inc. v. Caswell Building Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Teamsters Union Local 695 v. County of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. AntesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McCarville v. HinkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Boerner v. BoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API