Legal Opinion

Willing v. Porter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1954PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

When, in an application to be relieved of a default, there is a showing of excusable neglect and the showing of a meritorious defense to the entry of a judgment, the trial court may refuse to enter a default judgment and may grant a defendant an opportunity to plead. The terms of sec. 270.62 (1), (2), Stats., providing that “ a default judgment may be entered” and “the plaintiff may apply to the court for judgment” do not mean that the court is required to enter a default judgment. The word “may” is not mandatory. This follows from sec. 269.46 (1) which provides that:

“The court may, upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ledebuhr v. Grand Grove of Wisconsin of the Order of DruidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Brand v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. McKey v. EgelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Martin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Hollingsworth v. American Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Miller v. Hanover InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API