Legal Opinion

Koehne v. Harvey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1944No. 244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit was instituted below in the Landlord and Tenant Branch for possession of a room in an office building. The landlord alleged that notice to quit had been served as required by law. The tenant filed a plea in abatement which was overruled, and the case went to hearing on the merits. The trial court found in favor of the landlord and thereafter the tenant filed a motion entitled, “Motion for a new trial, arrest of finding for possession, and/or dismissal.” One of the grounds of this motion was that the original notice to quit, which had not been produced by the tenant at the trial, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. In Re SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Ray v. BruceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. New Orleans v. EmsheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Bromfield-Thompson v. McNallyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API