Legal Opinion
Crump v. Worldcom, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 26, 2001No. 2:00-cv-02982PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion for remand. Plaintiffs alleged in their class action complaint, filed in the Chancery Court for Fayette, County, Tennessee, five causes of action: violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, T.C.A. § 47-18-102, and analogous statutes of other states; misrepresentation; negligent monitoring; negligent supervision and/or training; and unjust enrichment and/or disgorgement. Plaintiffs essentially allege that Defendants made misrepresentations that affected the sale of long distance…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ting v. AT & TDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Braco v. MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Guglielmo v. WorldCom, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.