Legal Opinion

Boston v. Black

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1983No. 83-134, 83-135, 83-136, 83-137, 83-138, 83-186PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

These consolidated appeals question the method of awarding good time credits to committed offenders. They result from the denials of applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by the relators-appellants Johnny Boston, Larry Glouser, and David Moreno; from unfavorable declaratory judgments and denials of writs of habeas corpus to the plaintiffs-appellants Sandy P. Kerns and Michael J. LaFreniere; and from a declaratory judgment unfavorable to plaintiff-appellant Steven G. Hurley. We affirm in all respects.

It seems appropriate to begin this analysis with a historical review.

In 1975 the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PhilippsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SchreinNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wounded Shield v. GunterNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jones v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Hilgers v. EvnenNebraska Supreme Court · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API