Legal Opinion

In Re: Asbestos Prod

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2007No. 06-20835Published

1Opinion of the Court

478 F.3d 670

In Re: CLIENTS AND FORMER CLIENTS OF BARON & BUDD, P.C. and Occupational Medical Resources, Inc., Petitioners.

No. 06-20835.

No. 06-20836 Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 8, 2007.

Alan B. Rich, Baron & Budd, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner Clients.

Austin H. England, Veon & England, Irving, TX, for Petitioner Occ. Med. Res. Inc.

Walter G. Watkins, Jr., Fred H. Krutz, III, Marcy B. Croft, Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, Jackson, MS, Roger Henry Nebel, Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Petitions for Writs of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In Re Subpoenas Served on Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering & Goodwin Proctor LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. VISX, Inc. v. Nidek Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  5. In re Clients & Former Clients of Baron & Budd, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API