Legal Opinion
In re Clients & Former Clients of Baron & Budd, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2007No. Nos. 06-20835, 06-20836PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners are Occupational Medical Resources, Inc. (“OMR”), and individuals whose records are in OMR’s possession. Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to rule on motions to intervene and motions to quash regarding a subpoena. We deny the petition.
I
The respondents are defendants in matters pending in the Asbestos Multi-Dis-trict Litigation Court No. 875 (“MDL 875”) in the United States District Court *671for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, respondents issued a subpoena through the United States District Court for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re Subpoenas Served on Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering & Goodwin Proctor LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- VISX, Inc. v. Nidek Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Certain Represented By Forman Perry Watkins Krutz & Tardy LLP v. Clients & Former Clients of Baron & Budd PCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re: Asbestos ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re: Asbestos ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re: Asbestos ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.