Legal Opinion

Jones v. Honeywell, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1979No. 49036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Employer Hiawatha Metalcraft, Inc. and its insurer seek review by writ of certiorari of an order of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals denying them reimbursement from the special compensation fund on the basis that the filing of a medical report did not constitute registration of the fund under the statute in effect when the filing occurred. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. The employee was first injured on December 3, 1969, while in the employment of Honeywell, Inc. That matter culminated in the execution of a settlement stipulation between the employee and Honeywell,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halverson v. RolvaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Miller v. Norris CreameriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Stangel v. LAKEHEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Shively v. Mel Raeker Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API