Legal Opinion

Shively v. Mel Raeker Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1998No. C0-97-2386Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing the denial of reimbursement to the employer/insurer from the special compensation fund and ordering reimbursement. Because we hold that the application for registration of physical impairment was ineffective to register the employee’s preexisting physical impairment, we reverse and reinstate the denial of reimbursement.

Minnesota Statute section 176.131 (1990) (“second-injury law”) entitled an employer to be reimbursed from the special compensation fund for monies paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boltz v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Berends v. BELL ELEC. CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Jones v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Mertes v. National Steel Pellet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API