Legal Opinion

State v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1997No. 10-94-07752A; CA A89553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendant was charged with unlawful possession and unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. As to the possession charge, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to give certain requested jury instructions. We hold that there was no error and affirm the conviction on that charge without further discussion. As to the delivery charge, the indictment stated that defendant committed the crime some time during an eight-month period. Defendant asked the court to require the state to specify when the crime was supposed to have occurred. The trial court denied the request. At trial,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. YieldingOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AshkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. MaganaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. GreeleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. TeaguesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API