Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 11, 1966No. 5-3860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The parties to this suit, H. B. Stuckey and Roy Douglas, were formerly partners in the operation of a feed mill at Branch, in Franklin county. After the dissolution of the partnership Stuckey brought this suit to compel Douglas to account for any profits that may have been made during a period of three years while Douglas managed the business. This appeal is from a decree dismissing the complaint for want of equity, apparently upon the ground that Stuckey failed to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.

The proof is so meager and so incomplete that it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Powell v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davis v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Williams v. HenkleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  5. Walmsley v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. B. G. Coney Co. v. Radford Petroleum Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Ragar v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API