Legal Opinion

Williams v. Henkle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 21, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the City Court of Canton; the Hon. Harry C. Moran, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Upon the hearing on the bill of Loal Williams for an accounting of the partnership affairs of Williams & Henkle with his former partner, E. F. Henkle, the trial court sustained an exception of defendant and overruled other exceptions to the report of the master. The sum of $291.76 was found to be due from defendant to complainant and a decree entered for that sum against the defendant with an order for an execution. The defendant has sued out a writ of error to review that decree.

There is no dispute over the following facts. On March 1, 1908, complainant and defendant formed a partnership,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merritt v. MerrittIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Buntain v. CurtisIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Rosenstiel v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Randolph v. InmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. ToppingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Stuckey v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API