Legal Opinion
Andrew v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided November 5, 1982No. 6468PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Steve R. Andrew appeals from a conviction of theft by receiving, 1 contending that the statute under which he was convicted, AS 11.46.190, is unconstitutional. This statute, part of the Alaska Revised Criminal Code, first took effect on January 1, 1980, and provides, in relevant part:
Theft by Receiving (a) A person commits theft by receiving if he buys, receives, conceals, or disposes of stolen property with reckless disregard that the property was stolen.
Andrew alleges that AS 11.46.190 violates constitutional due process by defining the conduct prohibited in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Capshaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Leonard B. Panther v. Lloyd F. Hames, Commissioner, Alaska Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Panther v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.