Legal Opinion

Paul Handy Nunley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1961No. 6771_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

On his plea of guilty appellant Nunley was sentenced to consecutive terms totaling 30 years for various narcotic offenses. For the second time he seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On his first application he contended that he was not mentally competent at the time of the entry of the guilty plea and that he was not represented by competent and effective counsel. This court affirmed the trial court’s denial of relief and held that the conviction could not be collaterally attacked on the ground of insanity at the time of the commission of the offense or at the time of conviction; that he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. The United States of America v. Emanuel LesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. Billie Frield SwaggertyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Paul Handy Nunley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Clyde W. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Ralph Raymond Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. Robert Barber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Armour Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API