Legal Opinion

Paul Handy Nunley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1960No. 6407_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In this proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, Nunley seeks relief from a sentence imposed upon him after pleading guilty in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, to offenses involving the sale of narcotics in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371, 26 U.S. C.A. § 4704(a), and § 4705(a). The petitioner alleges that he was not mentally competent to enter the plea of guilty and that he was not adequately represented by counsel at the time of the entry of the plea and the sentence.

The question of insanity'or the competency of defendant to enter a plea of guilty was not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Willis v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Hahn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Coy George Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Caldwell v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. David Holston Roddy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Marvin Joe Igo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API