Legal Opinion

Cities of Abilene v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEXAS

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 23, 2004No. 03-03-00463-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACK KIDD, Justice.

Appellants Cities of Abilene, San Angelo, and Vernon (“the cities”) appeal a district court judgment that affirmed a final order of the Public Utility Commission (“Commission”) in favor of AEP Texas North Company (“AEP”). 1 The Commission determined that a prior settlement order was ambiguous with respect to the recovery of certain costs incurred before the commencement of commercial operations at the Southwest Mesa Wind Farm and that these costs could be recovered in a fuel reconciliation proceeding. See Tex. UtiLCode Ann. § 36.203 (West 1998). Additionally, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Shamrock Psychiatric Clinic, P.A. v. Tex. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  4. AEP Texas Central Co. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Alamo Community College District v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API