Legal Opinion

Hencken v. Bethlehem Municipal Water Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 49PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

This appeal is by the defendant, Bethlehem Municipal Water Authority, from a judgment in eminent domain proceedings for the condemnation of part of a large tract of land, owned by plaintiffs, in Towamensing Township, Carbon County, for the construction of defendant’s Wild Creek Dam. On June 8, 1939, appellant adopted a resolution appropriating plaintiff’s land “for the purpose of erecting and constructing [a] dam, lay pipe lines, and constructing and erecting other buildings for the operation of a water system . . .” and filed a condemnation bond which was approved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Stevenson v. Ebervale Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Davis v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Wadsworth v. Manufacturer's Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Chauvin v. Superior Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Whitemarsh Township Authority v. ElwertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Abbott v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Lambert v. PBI INDUSTRIESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API