Briggs v. Thompson
New York Supreme Court
M‘ CEELLAN, for the defendants, moved, that the plaintiff cause satisfaction of the judgment to be entered up on the record in this cause, and that he pay the costs. It appeared from the affidavit, which he read, that on the 15th of August, 1815, the defendants paid to the plaintiff’s attorney> ti*6 full amount of the judgment which had been entered up that day ; but no satisfaction was entered.
Read the full summary
M‘ CEELLAN, for the defendants, moved, that the plaintiff cause satisfaction of the judgment to be entered up on the record in this cause, and that he pay the costs. It appeared from the affidavit, which he read, that on the 15th of August, 1815, the defendants paid to the plaintiff’s attorney> ti*6 full amount of the judgment which had been entered up that day ; but no satisfaction was entered. On the 16th of August last, one of the defendants applied to the plaintiff’s attorney, for that purpose, who advised William Shotwell, the real plaintiff, (the suit having been an action of trespass…
1Per curiam
Take your rule, that the plaintiff acknowledge satisfaction of the judgment, and that he pay the costs, together with the costs of the motion.
Motion granted.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Moseley v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
- Mumford v. StockerNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Martin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1860
- Philanthropic Building Ass'n v. McKnightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
- Griswold v. HillU.S. Circuit Court for New York · 1825
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.