Legal Opinion

Huckstep v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Sandra Marie Huckstep is a former employee of Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). WMATA terminated Ms. Huckstep following an accident between a WMATA bus that she was operating and a passenger vehicle. Ms. Huckstep sued WMATA, alleging that her termination was motivated by gender discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Because no reasonable jury could find that WMATA unlawfully discriminated against…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Liew v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Kalantaripour v. George Washington Medical Faculty AssociatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Pinney v. BridenstineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  5. Tarquinii v. HarkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API