Legal Opinion

Milliken Research Corporation v. Dan River, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 5, 1984No. Appeal 83-727Published

1Opinion of the Court

739 F.2d 587

222 U.S.P.Q. 571

MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

DAN RIVER, INC., Appellee.

Appeal No. 83-727.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

July 5, 1984.

Tom Arnold, Houston, Tex., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Jack C. Goldstein, Houston, Tex.

Roger W. Parkhurst and James A. Oliff, Alexandria, Va., of counsel.

Lewis T. Booker, Richmond, Va., and David Rabin, Greensboro, N.C., argued for appellee. With them on the brief were H.H. Huntley and L.A. Goodson, Jr., Danville, Va.

Before SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges, and KELLAM, Senior District Judge.*

NIES,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API