Legal Opinion

Newman v. Meisel-Galland Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant Meisel-Galland Co., Inc., seeks to set aside two judgments confessed by the latter to the defendants Lowenstein and Meskin *495immediately prior to the date of the entry of plaintiff’s judgment, on the ground that they constituted preferences in violation of the provisions of section 15 of the Stock Corporation Law (as amd. by Laws of 1929, chap. 653). Plaintiff also seeks a personal judgment against the defendants Meisel, Popkin and Peskin, who, at the time of the alleged preferences, were directors of the defendant corporation.

The defendants set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Throop v. Hatch Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Lodi Chemical Co. v. National Lead Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Hilton v. . ErnstNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Pennsylvania R. v. PeddrickDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API