Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1986No. 02250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

The essential question presented in this appeal is whether a pending equity action seeking the partition of entireties property is pre-empted or superseded by a subsequently filed complaint in divorce which requests, inter alia, equitable distribution pursuant to the Divorce Code of 1980.1

Appellant, Jerome Goldstein, and appellee, Helene Gold-stein, were married on August 27, 1972. On January 18, 1982, appellant filed an action in equity which alleged that appellee had misappropriated approximately $43,680 which had been held in the parties’ joint bank account. Appellant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Marinello v. MarinelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Conrady v. ConradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Marinello v. MarinelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API